Comparing action disorganisation syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks
Morady, K and Humphreys, GW (2008) Comparing action disorganisation syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks. Neurocase : case studies in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and behavioural neurology . pp. 1-12. ISSN 0012-1649
URL of Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13554790802524214
Identification Number/DOI: 10.1080/13554790802524214
The term 'action disorganisation syndrome' has been used to describe patients with selective impairments in carrying out multi-step everyday tasks, which are not linked to motor deficits. We used a range of everyday life tasks to examine the effects on a patient with ADS of having related distractors present during task performance. The presence of related distractors increased omission errors in the patient. In a second experiment we assessed whether we could mimic this pattern of deficit when normal participants carried out the everyday tasks and a secondary task was imposed to place demands on executive processes. Secondary task load produced a general increase in errors in the controls and reduced the number of self-correcting responses, but there were no proportional increases in omission errors. Control participants and patients with ADS may suffer from demands on different processes involved in the performance of everyday actions. We discuss the implications for understanding everyday actions.
If the "URL of Published Version" above does not provide full text, click here to search for an alternative UoB-subscribed service using FindIt@Bham
Edit Item (Staff only)